Quantcast
Channel: Chicken
Viewing all 424 articles
Browse latest View live

We tried McDonald's answer to Chick-fil-A — here's the verdict

$
0
0

Buttermilk 2

In terms of fast food, Chick-fil-A is considered the ultimate in chicken sandwiches.

Company sales have grown 14.4% in the past year. Chick-fil-A has ousted KFC as the nation's largest chicken chain.

McDonald's is taking notice.

McDonald's recently revamped its poultry offerings, releasing the artisan grilled chicken for wraps and sandwiches, as well as the new buttermilk crispy chicken.

Made of 100% chicken breast, it is touted as an improvement over the former crispy chicken patties at McDonald's.

Can the new chicken win back customers and take on the rapidly expanding Chick-fil-A?

We tried the new buttermilk crispy chicken sandwich to find out.

SEE ALSO: McDonald's is releasing a breakfast version of the McWrap

The sandwich looks pretty good in the photos on the new ordering kiosks at McDonald's, but does the real thing ever really look as appetizing as the photo?



McDonald's is clearly pushing this new chicken a lot, plastering the sides of its bags and cups with tales of tender, bold, crispy chicken goodness.



It came in a clubhouse sandwich box, however. Is that right? Oh well.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

NOW WATCH: More trouble for Subway's Jared Fogle...


McDonald’s released a 'Chick-fil-A killer' and it’s amazing

These are the most absurd academic studies this year

I tried the McDonald's answer to Chick-fil-A next to the real thing — and the winner is obvious

$
0
0

McDonald's Chicken vs Chick-fil-A

In parts of the country, you can't mention a chicken sandwich without invoking praise for Chick-fil-A.

Its chicken sandwich has reigned supreme for a while, and McDonald's is taking notice.

The iconic fast-food burger chain recently overhauled its chicken sandwich with a new buttermilk recipe that is receiving some positive feedback.

I grew up in New Hampshire and went to college in Boston — which has famously banned Chick-fil-A — so I've never truly tried a Chick-fil-A sandwich.

Luckily, the much-anticipated new location in New York City sent us a sample ahead of the opening October 3, so I decided to put the two chicken-sandwich rivals to the ultimate test.

SEE ALSO: Why Chick-fil-A is the best fast-food chain in America

McDonald's fan? This health-conscious fast-food chain is challenging McDonald's to be healthier

So here they are safe, sound, and steaming hot in their respective packages.



McDonald's clearly pushes the descriptions of the food a bit more, while Chick-fil-A relies simply on its name to get the idea of tender crispy chicken across.



Let the chicken championship commence!



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

NOW WATCH: This is what 'The Most Interesting Man in the World' is really like

These people were willing to camp overnight in a storm for about $300 worth of free Chick-fil-A

This homeless man had a brilliant response to being excluded from Chick-fil-A's free-food giveaway

An Australian restaurant chain is trying to get a chicken to use the internet

This stunning visualization breaks down all the ingredients in your processed foods


Meat lovers rate fake and real chicken nuggets in a blind taste test

How to properly cut up a chicken

We tried McDonald's new Chick-fil-A copycat menu items against the real thing — here's the verdict

$
0
0

McDonald's Chick fil A Chicken 1

When it comes to chicken, Chick-fil-A is hard to beat.

But recently, McDonald's has started emulating the company's menu as part of its larger reform plan.

Premium chicken has replaced the dubious chicken of the past on McDonald's menus.

Items like buttermilk-chicken sandwiches, premium Chicken Selects strips, and grilled-chicken sandwiches are now being offered.

While these healthier options are welcome changes, can they stand up to Chick-fil-A's famed chicken?

We decided to compare three of McDonald's premium chicken offerings to their Chick-fil-A counterparts.

SEE ALSO: Chick-fil-A is making an unprecedented move to hook millennial moms

Here they are, the tip-top of fast-food premium chicken: chicken strips, grilled chicken sandwiches, and crispy chicken sandwiches from McDonald's and Chick-fil-A.



First, let's take a look at what McDonald's is offering.



The crispy buttermilk-chicken sandwich was released last year as a replacement for the normal crispy-chicken patty. It comes in a soft roll that tastes rather sweet when paired with chicken. It fares better with savory burgers.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Why Indiana just killed over 400,000 birds — and might not be done yet

$
0
0

chickens poultry usda

An outbreak of bird flu — strain H5N2 — devastated the US poultry industry last year, causing the death of 48 million chickens and turkeys. 

Now a new strain, H7N8, is sweeping chicken and turkey farms in Indiana.

The US Department of Agriculture has stepped in to contain the avian flu virus from spreading any further, ordering more than 400,000 chickens and turkeys to be euthanized at 10 different farms, the Associated Press reported. Officials try to kill infected birds within 24 hours of diagnosis. 

Killing the birds is the best way to stop the outbreak, since there's no vaccine against the H7N8 virus. Most foreign trade partners won't import vaccinated poultry anyway, however, since the test for the flu virus makes it look like birds that have received a vaccine are infected. 

Even after their livestock are killed, farms have to be placed under quarantine for weeks. Last year's H5N2 outbreak cost the poultry industry $3.3 billion, Reuters reported. 

The new H7N8 virus has never infected any humans, according to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. All poultry is disinfected and inspected before it goes to market, too, so consumers shouldn't worry about buying chicken or turkey. 

Experts don't know where this new strain originated yet, though they suspect it mutated from a milder form into a more virulent version on one of the infected farms in Indiana. Mild bird flu gives poultry "ruffled feathers and a drop in egg production,"the CDC says, while this highly pathogenic version can spread quickly and kill infected birds.

turkeys farm usda

Last year's outbreak was a sort of wake up call, and the USDA and farmers have been upping their biosecurity efforts ever since. Everyone hopes this outbreak doesn't turn into what happened in 2015. But even after euthanizing hundreds of thousands of birds, farms are not yet in the clear.

"If the initial infection did come from wild birds, many of whom may be carrying H7N8 viruses, we can expect more cases of H7N8 infection of poultry,"Dr. Jürgen Richt, director of the Department of Homeland Security Center of Excellence for Emerging and Zoonotic Animal Diseases at Kansas State University, said in a statement. "Sampling of wild birds in the affected areas in Indiana will most likely help in determining the source of the infection."

That means that as farmers try to stamp out the virus before it becomes more virulent or infects more of their flock, additional birds may be culled as the year goes on.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: To track down illegal dumpers, the Peruvian government is strapping GoPros onto vultures

A teen built a KFC chicken vending machine made entirely of Lego blocks — here's how it works

KFC just proved rumors of its mutant chickens are not real

$
0
0

mutant chicken final copy 1

KFC has won a lawsuit against three Chinese companies charged with spreading rumors that the fast-food chain uses mutated chickens with extra limbs.

A Shanghai court has fined three tech firms, including Yingchenanzhi Success and Culture Communication, Taiyuan Zero Point Technology, and Shanxi Weilukuang Technology, for damaging KFC's reputation by posting the rumors on their social messaging accounts, Reuters reports.

The firms have been ordered to pay KFC a combined 600,000 yuan, or $91,191. KFC was originally seeking compensation of up to 1.5 million yuan, or $245,000, from each company.

Stories about the "mutant" chickens have been circulating for years.

One rumor that gained traction last year claimed the federal government forced KFC to shorten its name from Kentucky Fried Chicken when it stopped using "real chickens" and started using these tube-fed "genetically modified organisms."

The story, which cited a hoax University of New Hampshire study, was posted on the viral news site Daily Buzz Live, pumping new life into a rumor that had been circulating for more than a decade.

"There is absolutely no truth to this ridiculous urban legend, which has been debunked many times," KFC spokesman Rick Maynard told Business Insider last year. "KFC uses only top quality poultry from trusted companies like Tyson and Pilgrim’s Pride — the same brands customers know from their local supermarkets."

Rumors about the mutant chickens have been debunked by Snopes.com, which notes that the company's 1991 name change had to do with menu pages and a desire to eliminate the word "fried," and nothing to do with governmental regulations.

"These so-called 'chickens' are kept alive by tubes inserted into their bodies to pump blood and nutrients throughout their structure," according to false Daily Buzz Live story. "They have no beaks, no feathers and no feet. They grow with multiple legs and wings on one 'chicken.' Their bone structure is dramatically shrunk to get more meat out of them. This is great for KFC because it saves them money for their production costs."

The University of New Hampshire has also repeatedly debunked the claim that they authored a study on KFC's mutant chickens. 

"An active Internet hoax, of the urban legend type, falsely claims that KFC (Kentucky Fried Chicken) is using genetically engineered organisms instead of chickens," according to a statement posted on the university's website. "The hoax includes reference to an unspecified study of KFC done at the University of New Hampshire and there is no such research or study that was done here."

See also:  This is how Chicken McNuggets are made

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: We tried all the burgers on the McDonald's 'secret menu'

This McDonald's secret menu item that's unlike anything we've ever seen is going public

$
0
0

mcdonald's chicken mcgriddle

There's a new way to enjoy a poultry-fueled breakfast at a handful of McDonald's locations.

The world's larger burger chain -- and the undisputed champ of drive-thru breakfasts -- is testing the Chicken McGriddle at 11 restaurants through central Ohio. 

It's the same McGriddle bun that the chain has been selling for years -- a pair of maple syrup-infused griddle cakes that don't get sticky in your hands -- but with a fried chicken patty instead of the usual egg, cheese, and either bacon or sausage protein inside.

It's been touted as a "secret menu" item in the past, but now it's officially on the menu at a handful of Columbus-area eateries. The test will run through late March.

Foodies won't be flocking to grab one if the syrupy sweet breakfast sandwich goes national. McDonald's is using the cheap and iffy McChicken patty, and not the plump 100% chicken breast and buttermilk patty it uses on its premium lunch and dinner sandwich. It's how McDonald's can keep the new sandwich at just $2 or less. However, it is a logical -- and perhaps more importantly marketable -- evolutionary move for Mickey D's. 

This isn't the first time McDonald's is offering a poultry item for breakfast. Many markets offer the McChicken patty as a southern-style biscuit sandwich. However, it's surprising that a chain that relied on premium grilled and fried chicken sandwiches to go upscale a few years ago hasn't given chicken a bigger role on its morning menu.

Chick-fil-A is a chain that does a lot of morning traffic with a breakfast menu that leans heavily on its signature poultry. Bojangles' is another chicken chain that has been very successful in fueling morning commuters. When Bojangles' went public last year, its prospectus revealed that it serves up 38% of its revenue before 11a.m. If Bojangles' and Chick-fil-A are drawing so well in the morning, why wouldn't McDonald's want to cash in on the fun?

Bojangles 1McDonald's is already on the comeback trail. It posted a 5.7% year-over-year gain in comps for its stateside restaurants during the holiday quarter, the chain's biggest gain in years. It was the first time that comps for the fourth quarter weren't negative since 2012. 

Investors had forgiven McDonald's long before its customers did. The stock held up well during the roughly two years of negative domestic comps, hitting a fresh all-time high earlier this month. This doesn't mean that it's back. McDonald's still seems to be championing the cause of simplification even as it adds new items to its menu. It wants to have its cake -- or in this case a griddle cake with a McChicken patty inside -- and eat it, too. This should be a hot product for the chain if and when it goes national, but it doesn't mean that every fowl play is worth fielding.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here’s why you should never put Q-Tips in your ears


I ate at a McDonald’s in Spain, and it was so much better than in America

Subway is trying to turn around business by making this major change to its menu

Why you should ignore that 'hormone free' label the next time you buy pork or chicken

$
0
0

Just bare chicken no hormones_an

Walk through the meat section of the grocery store, and you'll notice the dizzying array of claims on food packaging. It's enough to frazzle anyone.

"Organic.""All natural.""GMO free.""Grass fed.""Cage free.""Cruelty free.""Hormone free." These and other labels are everywhere on meat.

If they confuse you, you're not alone. Many of these phrases don't mean what you might think.

But when it comes to any poultry or pork products — we're talking chicken, bacon, turkey, ducks, pork chops, and pork or chicken sausages — there's one claim that is especially unnecessary: "hormone free" or "no added hormones."

This label might make you believe that the product is different or healthier than similar products without that label.

But the reality is that all poultry and pork sold in the US must be "hormone free."

The US Food and Drug Administration has not approved any growth hormones for use in raising pigs and birds for food, therefore the US Department of Agriculture does not allow it.

In short: It's illegal to sell pork or poultry in the US that was raised with added hormones.

Chickens Farm

In fact, manufacturers can't add a "no hormones" label on any package of pork or poultry unless it's accompanied by a disclaimer that says,"federal regulations prohibit the use of hormones."

That disclaimer is supposed to prevent confusion. But often, manufacturers will shrink, minimize, or obscure it while blowing up a "hormone free" claim.

Check out this package of chicken, for example. The average consumer may not notice the starred disclaimer in tiny, thin font during a quick shopping trip:

Just bare chicken no hormones_an2_cropped

The same goes for these grilled chicken strips:

TysonGrilledandReady_an

And while this deli turkey displays the disclaimer more visibly than others, it's still in smaller and thinner font than the "without added hormones" claim above it:

hormel natural choice meats an

To date, the FDA has only approved the use of steroid hormones in sheep and cows raised for beef. Under the current regulations, there are no approved uses of steroid hormones in dairy cows, veal calves, pigs, or poultry (there is, however, an approved use of the non-steroidal hormone bovine somatotropin (bST or rbST) in dairy cows to increase their milk production).

Farmers and big meat companies may pump their livestock full of such growth-promoting drugs — which can include natural and synthetic versions of estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone — to increase their weight. These drugs help the animal convert their feed into muscle, fat, and other tissues more efficiently than they would naturally.

There is debate within the scientific community over whether these added drugs can harm the health of humans, so when given the chance, companies will market their products as such (even when unnecessary).

So if you're deciding between a package of pork or poultry that says "no hormones added" and a less expensive package that doesn't make this claim, you can rest assured that they're both the same — at least in the added hormone department.

And while you're at it, pay no mind to the "natural" label either. The FDA has "not developed a definition" for the term, so it can mean anything or nothing at all.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Meat lovers rate fake and real chicken nuggets in a blind taste test

This perfect fried chicken only needs to be fried for 3 minutes

Scientists are one step closer to turning chickens into dinosaurs

$
0
0

Velociraptor Jurassic World

We know that birds are the last remaining avian dinosaurs, descendants of the theropod dinosaurs like the velociraptor.

Still, closely related as they might be, a chicken doesn't look much like how we picture a velociraptor.

But researchers have been trying to figure out which genetic changes caused dinos to change in appearance into modern birds, losing their arms, snouts, tails, and powerful legs.

Now, a group of researchers led by Joao Francisco Botelho of the University of Chile has solved another piece of that puzzle.

They've figured out why the fibula bone in birds — one of the two twin thin bones that sit side by side in a chicken leg — is too short and not as well developed as the fibula of their theropod ancestors.

And by tweaking certain genes to change bone growth, the researchers have shown they can reverse this process in chicken embryos and cause their legs to start to form in the more dinosaur-like structure.

The researchers didn't actually let these embryos grow to the hatching phase, but they did show that they've figured out how to reverse another step in evolution, able to make birds express throwback dinosaur traits.

They published these results in the journal Evolution.

Building a 'chickenosaurus'

These same researchers have done similar work in the past too, when they figured out how to make birds lose the opposable toe that lets them cling to branches to grow a more dinosaur-like foot.

Eventually, if someone can figure out how to reverse all the differences between modern birds and dinosaurs, we might be able to actually be able to make a sort of dino-bird, something with the legs, tail, and snout of a dinosaur.

It would be a dino-chicken, or a "chickenosaurus,"in the words of Jack Horner, the paleontologist who worked on "Jurassic World" (and the rest of the "Jurassic Park" films).

The group in Chile isn't trying to do that, they just want to figure out if they can explain the genetic changes that made modern birds look the way they do, compared to their ancestors.

"The experiments are focused on single traits to test specific hypotheses," Alexander Vargas of the University of Chile said in a press release announcing the finding. "Not only do we know a great deal about bird development, but also about the dinosaur-bird transition, which is well-documented by the fossil record. This leads naturally to hypotheses on the evolution of development, that can be explored in the lab."

Others, including Horner, are still interested in seeing if they can actually create a new little dinosaur.

It would be a small, feathered creature, with a tail that helps it balance, small arms with claws, and a toothy snout, instead of a beak.

"If we can make a dino-chicken, it's pretty cool,"Horner told Tech Insider in 2015.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: There is a weird plastic ball in every can of Guinness — here's what it does

Viewing all 424 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>